data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a2e6/6a2e61074f79786fe741958a77142a59eb98e9ed" alt=""
Alex Denne
Head of Growth (Open Source Law) @ Genie AI | 3 x UCL-Certified in Contract Law & Drafting | 4+ Years Managing 1M+ Legal Documents | Serial Founder & Legal AI Author
Evaluating XAI Methods in Legal AI
18th December 2024
3 min
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2461/a246109d02ea659f16478213a69b2bc0202f15e6" alt="".png)
Note: This article is just one of 60+ sections from our full report titled: The 2024 Legal AI Retrospective - Key Lessons from the Past Year. Please download the full report to check any citations.
Evaluating XAI Methods
Explanation: We need to set up rules and benchmarks for Legal AI, so we can consistently evaluate and improve them.
Challenge:
• Lack of standardized evaluation methods
• Difficulties in human subject evaluations
Research Direction:
• Develop comprehensive evaluation metrics
• Implement standardized protocols for human evaluations
Interested in joining our team? Explore career opportunities with us and be a part of the future of Legal AI.
Download our whitepaper on the future of AI in Legal
By providing your email address you are consenting to our Privacy Notice.